Employment Law
What an Employment Tribunal Costs an Employer (2026)
Five firms publish their price for defending a simple unfair dismissal. It runs from £7,500 to £100,000 + VAT depending on which one you instruct. Because the tribunal is each-side-pays, a winning employer normally recovers none of it. Updated July 2026.
The SRA Transparency Rules make a firm that advertises employment tribunal work publish its price for defending an unfair or wrongful dismissal claim. Read five of those pages and the striking thing is how little they agree: the same simple defence is £7,500 to £12,500 + VAT at Harrington Law and £50,000 to £100,000 at A&O Shearman. The published spread, not a market average, is the number to plan against. Counsel is extra, billed as a disbursement; the same five firms publish counsel figures of £850 to £20,000 + VAT a day.
The number that controls the decision is not the potential award but the cost of defending regardless of merit: because the tribunal is each-side-pays, an employer that wins normally recovers none of its fees. That is why so many claims settle at ACAS conciliation.
The employer's cost, line by line
The two defence rows are the lowest and highest figures across the five published price pages in the table below, not an average. The Transparency Rules mandate published pricing for defending unfair and wrongful dismissal claims only. Discrimination and whistleblowing claims sit outside that mandatory scope, so none of the five prices them separately; instead each lists a linked discrimination allegation or a whistleblowing dismissal as a factor that moves a case into its medium or high complexity band, and costs can exceed the published figures in the most complex cases. Compensation caps are the statutory limits for dismissals on or after 6 April 2026. There is no tribunal fee, but VAT applies to legal fees, and counsel, expert and settlement figures are additional.
What five firms publish for the same defence
Rule 1.3 of the SRA Transparency Rules requires a firm that advertises employment tribunal work to publish its price for defending unfair and wrongful dismissal claims, broken down by complexity. That makes this one of the few corners of legal pricing where you can compare real numbers rather than estimates. Each row below was read off that firm's own price page on 4 October 2026 and excludes VAT.
- Simple
- £7,500 to £12,500
- Medium complexity
- £12,500 to £20,000
- High complexity
- £20,000 to £35,000
- Counsel (disbursement)
- £850 to £3,500 per extra hearing day
- Simple
- £8,000 to £10,000
- Medium complexity
- £10,000 to £20,000
- High complexity
- £20,000 to £50,000
- Counsel (disbursement)
- £2,000 to £3,500 per day
- Simple
- £30,000 to £35,000
- Medium complexity
- £40,000
- High complexity
- £48,000
- Counsel (disbursement)
- £8,000 brief fee, then £1,500 to £3,000 a day
- Simple
- £50,000 to £100,000
- Medium complexity
- £100,000 to £200,000
- High complexity
- £200,000 to £1m or higher
- Counsel (disbursement)
- £5,000 to £15,000 per day
- Simple
- £50,000 to £100,000
- Medium complexity
- £100,000 to £200,000
- High complexity
- £200,000 to £1.5m or higher
- Counsel (disbursement)
- £5,000 to £20,000 per day
The spread is the finding. For a simple unfair dismissal defence the highest published figure is more than thirteen times the lowest, and the firms are not describing different work: they are all pricing one claim run to a final hearing. Nothing about the tribunal process changes between them, so an employer choosing a firm is choosing an order of magnitude. The two City statements also show how much of the bill sits outside the solicitor's own fee: A&O Shearman adds £3,000 to £5,000 a day for attending the hearing on top of its band, and both City firms quote counsel at five figures a day.
Why defending is expensive even when you win: the each-side-pays rule
Unlike civil litigation in the County Court or High Court, the employment tribunal does not award costs to the winner as standard. Each party bears its own legal costs whatever the result. A costs order against the claimant is exceptional: it is made only where the claimant acted unreasonably (pursued a hopeless claim, lied, made baseless allegations, or rejected a plainly reasonable offer), and awards are typically modest at £1,000 to £20,000, which is the most a tribunal can fix without a detailed assessment of the costs; a larger order goes to detailed assessment. The tribunal can also take the claimant's means into account when deciding whether to order costs at all.
The practical consequence for an employer is stark. Defend a weak unfair dismissal claim all the way to a hearing, win it, and you are still out of pocket by whatever your firm's published band said: £7,500 to £12,500 + VAT at the regional end, £50,000 to £100,000 at the City end, with nothing to recover either way. The strength of your case does not change that arithmetic; only how you dispose of the claim does.
ACAS early conciliation (free, and mandatory for the claimant)
Before a claimant can lodge a tribunal claim they must notify ACAS, which offers both sides free conciliation for up to six weeks. For an employer this is the cheapest off-ramp in the whole process: ACAS will explore a settlement before either side has run up significant legal costs. Around two-thirds of early conciliation cases do not go on to a tribunal claim. Engaging properly at this stage, rather than treating it as a formality, is the single most cost-effective thing an employer can do.
Settle or defend? The commercial calculation
The decision is rarely about who is right. It is defence cost plus management time plus the risk of an award, weighed against the settlement figure. A COT3 recorded through ACAS, or a settlement agreement offered under a protected conversation (section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996), can end a claim for less than the cost of defending it. The employer typically also funds the employee's independent legal advice on a settlement agreement, which is a modest £250 to £500 + VAT contribution. Where a claim is weak but would still cost the lower end of your firm's published band to defend, a four- or five-figure settlement is often the commercially rational choice even for an employer who is confident of winning.
The opposite is also true: settling every claim invites more of them, and a well-documented, fairly-handled dismissal that is cheap to defend changes the calculation. The point is that the costs regime, not the merits alone, drives the decision.
What an employer pays if the claim succeeds
These awards sit on top of the employer's own legal costs, which are still not recoverable:
- Basic award (unfair dismissal): age × years of service × a week's pay, with a week's pay capped at £751 from 6 April 2026. Maximum about £22,530.
- Compensatory award (unfair dismissal): the lower of 52 weeks' pay or £123,543 (from 6 April 2026). This cap is due to be removed entirely from 1 January 2027 under the Employment Rights Act 2025.
- Discrimination and whistleblowing: uncapped. Injury to feelings is awarded on the Vento bands: for claims presented on or after 6 April 2026, lower £1,300 to £12,600, middle £12,600 to £37,700, upper £37,700 to £62,900, with more in the most exceptional cases.
Over 40 per cent of claims that reach a full hearing succeed on at least part of the claim (MoJ tribunal statistics), so the award is a live risk, not a remote one. But for most employers the recurring, certain cost is the legal spend, not the award.
How an employer keeps the cost down
- Get the paperwork right before the dismissal. A documented, fair procedure is the cheapest insurance there is. Most defence cost is spent reconstructing a process that was not properly recorded at the time.
- Take advice early, not at the hearing door. A few hours of employment advice before or during a disciplinary process costs a fraction of a defended claim.
- Use ACAS conciliation properly. It is free, and around two-thirds of early conciliation cases never become a tribunal claim. Treating it as a box-tick wastes the cheapest resolution route.
- Price the settlement against the defence, not the merits. If defending will cost £15,000 unrecoverable, a settlement below that can be the rational outcome even on a claim you would win.
- R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 (abolition of tribunal and EAT fees, not reintroduced)
- Employment Rights (Increase of Limits) Order 2026 (SI 2026/310): week's pay £751, compensatory cap £123,543
- Presidential Guidance: Vento bands, Ninth Addendum (claims on or after 6 April 2026)
- ACAS: early conciliation and settlement
- Defence and counsel figures: the five firms' own price pages published under the SRA Transparency Rules (linked in the table above), read 4 October 2026 and re-checked 6 October 2026