Consumer Protection

Complaining About a Solicitor: What It Costs in 2026

The Legal Ombudsman scheme is free to the complainant and can award up to £50,000. The firm's internal complaint process is also free, and 8 weeks of internal resolution is the gate before you can refer the matter onwards. Negligence claims and Solicitors Act assessments are the more expensive backstops.

Step 1: Complain to the firm

Every solicitor's firm in England and Wales is required to operate a written complaints procedure under the SRA Standards and Regulations. The procedure must be free to the complainant, must respond within reasonable time, and must include a final response within 8 weeks. The complaints partner (or, in smaller firms, the COLP or a designated senior solicitor) handles the matter. The firm is required to provide details of the procedure on engagement and to notify the complainant of their right to refer the matter to the Legal Ombudsman if not resolved.

Most complaints are resolved at this stage. A clear written complaint identifying the specific service issue (delay, communication, fee level, advice quality), the loss or detriment caused, and the remedy sought, typically prompts a settlement offer or remedial action. Firms have a strong commercial incentive to resolve internally: the £400 Legal Ombudsman case fee, the SRA reputational risk, and the regulatory cost of an Ombudsman investigation all push firms to settle reasonable complaints before they escalate.

The firm's final response either resolves the complaint or sets out the firm's position with reasons. The response must include a notice of the complainant's right to refer the matter to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months. Keep a copy: you need it to refer onwards. If the firm has not responded within 8 weeks of the initial complaint, you can refer to the Ombudsman without waiting further.

Step 2: Legal Ombudsman

The Legal Ombudsman is the statutory complaints handler for legal services in England and Wales, established under the Legal Services Act 2007. The scheme covers complaints about service from solicitors, barristers (when providing instructed services), licensed conveyancers, costs lawyers, patent and trade mark attorneys, notaries, and other regulated legal practitioners.

The complaint is made online, by post, or by phone. Initial triage assesses jurisdiction and time limits. If accepted, an investigator reviews the firm's file, the complainant's submissions, and contemporaneous correspondence. The investigator may attempt informal resolution before issuing a formal decision. The decision is binding on the firm if accepted by the complainant; the complainant can accept or reject. The scheme operates an internal review mechanism but there is limited external appeal: judicial review of an Ombudsman decision is the only formal route.

The Ombudsman can award up to £50,000 in financial redress per complaint (cap raised from £30,000 in April 2023). The Ombudsman can also direct the firm to refund fees, reduce or limit the bill, apologise, correct an error, take specific remedial action, or provide free additional service. In 2024 the Ombudsman published statistics showing that 51% of complaints reaching formal decision were upheld in whole or in part. Service complaints (delay, communication, fees) are the most common category.

Step 3: Solicitors Regulation Authority (conduct issues)

The SRA handles concerns about professional conduct rather than service quality. Conduct issues include dishonesty, breach of the SRA Standards and Regulations, breach of money laundering rules, failure to maintain the integrity of the client account, fraud, and serious failures of supervision. Reporting a concern to the SRA is free and is made online or in writing. The SRA assesses the report and may open an investigation, take regulatory action, or refer the matter to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) is an independent statutory tribunal under section 46 of the Solicitors Act 1974. The Tribunal has the power to fine the solicitor (no upper limit), suspend the practising certificate, strike the solicitor off the roll, or impose conditions. Tribunal hearings are public and reasoned decisions are published. The SDT does not award compensation to complainants: it is a regulatory body, not a redress body.

Most complaints that warrant SRA attention also justify a parallel Legal Ombudsman complaint, because the Ombudsman is the only forum that can award financial redress. The two routes can run in parallel.

Step 4: Solicitors Act 1974 assessment (fee disputes)

Where the dispute is specifically about the size of a solicitor's bill rather than the quality of service, the Solicitors Act 1974 provides a separate court procedure called detailed assessment. The application is made on Form N258 within one month of delivery of the bill (or up to 12 months in some circumstances, with court permission). A Costs Judge reviews each item of work, determines whether the time spent and rates charged were reasonable and proportionate, and reduces the bill accordingly.

The application fee in 2026 is £528. The procedure can be expensive: the client must pay for representation through the assessment, and if the bill is reduced by less than 20% the client typically pays the costs of the assessment. If the bill is reduced by 20% or more, the solicitor typically pays the costs. The 20% threshold incentivises firms to settle: many fee disputes are resolved by negotiation once a Solicitors Act application is intimated.

The Legal Ombudsman route is typically faster and free, with the £50,000 cap on financial redress. The Solicitors Act route is technical and adversarial but can result in larger bill reductions in high-value cases. The two routes are alternatives: you cannot pursue both simultaneously for the same bill.

Step 5: Professional negligence claim

Where the solicitor's failure has caused you financial loss substantially exceeding the £50,000 Ombudsman cap, a professional negligence claim through the courts is the appropriate route. The standard is the duty of reasonable care and skill owed to a client, breached, with consequent loss. Limitation runs 6 years from the date of breach (Limitation Act 1980 section 5), or 3 years from the date you knew or should reasonably have known of the loss (section 14A), capped at 15 years overall (section 14B).

All SRA-regulated firms must carry professional indemnity insurance with minimum cover of £2 million per claim (or £3 million for incorporated practices) under the SRA Indemnity Insurance Rules. Meritorious negligence claims are typically met by the insurer without enforcement difficulty. Where the firm has ceased trading, the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) and Assigned Risks Pool provide run-off protection for at least 6 years after closure.

Negligence claims typically cost £15,000 to £75,000 in legal fees to bring through to trial. Many claims settle pre-issue once the prospective defendant's insurer assesses the case. Specialist professional negligence firms (typically members of the Professional Negligence Lawyers Association) accept some cases on CFA terms, particularly where the prospects are strong and the loss is substantial.

Which route fits which complaint

FAQ