SolicitorCost.com is an independent information resource. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. Costs shown are indicative ranges. Always obtain a written quote.
Home/Legal Aid vs Private

Funding Solicitors

Legal Aid vs Private Solicitor 2026

The two funding routes compared on cost, eligibility, scope, and consumer experience. Updated May 2026.

Side-by-side comparison

AspectLegal aidPrivate retainer
Cost to you£0 if eligible. Possible contribution if income/capital sits in the contribution band. Statutory charge applies to recovered assets.Hourly rate or fixed fee. £140 to £579/hr per GHR; private market may exceed.
Means testGross income under £2,657/month, disposable income under £733/month, capital under £8,000 (£100k+ housing-equity disregards). Passporting on means-tested benefits.None. Open to anyone who can pay.
Merits testYes -- the case must have sufficient prospects of success and the cost must be proportionate.No. Your solicitor advises on merits but can take the case regardless.
Case types coveredFamily with abuse evidence, child protection, criminal defence, housing (homelessness, possession), immigration (asylum), some welfare benefits, mental health, judicial review.All case types.
Choice of solicitorLimited to firms holding a LAA contract for your case type.Any SRA-regulated solicitor.
Solicitor pay rateFixed LAA scale, e.g. family £50 to £130/hr (much lower than GHR).Whatever you agree -- typically GHR or higher.
Statutory chargeYes -- LAA recovers costs from recovered/preserved property under s.25 LASPO.No. Your costs are paid as you go (or under CFA).

Sources: Legal Aid Agency means thresholds, CJC Guideline Hourly Rates 2026, LAA Standard Civil Contract 2018 (as amended).

When legal aid is the right answer

  • You qualify on means and merits (or are passported via Universal Credit, JSA, ESA, Pension Credit guarantee).
  • Your case is a covered category: family with domestic abuse, child protection, criminal defence, housing possession, asylum, mental health.
  • You cannot afford private representation (the actual cost to you would be £0).
  • The case is unlikely to recover money or property (the statutory charge does not bite).

When private is the right answer

  • You earn above the means threshold and have no qualifying benefit.
  • Your case is excluded from legal aid (most divorce, most civil litigation, all commercial).
  • You want a specific specialist or City firm that does not hold an LAA contract.
  • The case is likely to recover significant assets and the statutory charge would consume most of the benefit.
  • You can use a CFA (no win no fee) -- see no win no fee explained.

The statutory charge -- worked example

Family financial proceedings under legal aid: client recovers £80,000 settlement. Total legal aid spent: £25,000. The Legal Aid Agency takes a charge over the recovered money for £25,000. Client's net recovery: £55,000.

In this scenario, the client received representation worth £25,000 for free during the case, but the statutory charge captures the equivalent cost from the eventual recovery. Compare to private retainer: the same client would have paid the same £25,000 plus VAT during the case but kept the full £80,000 settlement. The arithmetic for private representation is favourable where you have the cashflow to pay during proceedings; legal aid is favourable where you do not.

Hybrid options

  • Initial legal aid advice (Legal Help). Even where full representation is not available, a few hours of LAA-funded advice may be available to assess your case. Cheaper than a private initial consultation.
  • Pro bono. Free legal advice through law schools, FRU (Free Representation Unit), Advocate (formerly the Bar Pro Bono Unit), and Law Centres. Mostly for vulnerable clients on focused issues.
  • Unbundled / limited retainer. Pay a private solicitor for specific tasks (drafting one letter, reviewing a contract) rather than full representation. Sometimes a third of the cost.

Related guides

Updated 2026-05-11